New York, United States
Richard M. Nixon: disciplinary decision
Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, First Judicial Department
What the decision found
The Grievance Committee of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York brought five specifications of misconduct alleging obstruction of justice connected to Watergate. According to the opinion, they included obstructing an FBI investigation of the Democratic National Committee break-in, approving payments to E. Howard Hunt, and attempting to obstruct a Justice Department investigation of the break-in at the office of Daniel Ellsberg's psychiatrist. The court found the documentary evidence, including the White House tapes and congressional testimony, sufficient to sustain all charges. It held that its disciplinary power reached misconduct committed in public office.1
Response
According to the opinion, Nixon did not answer the petition or appear through counsel. He submitted a resignation from the bar that lacked the required acknowledgment of culpability. The court said his failure to answer "must be construed by this court as an admission of the charges."1
Appeal and later events
The court decided the matter on default after an inquest on the documents. No later order was found in the sources reviewed.1
Status now
Disbarred in New York by order of 8 July 1976.1
Sources
- New York Appellate Division, First Department (text via CounselStack), In re Nixon, 53 A.D.2d 178, 385 N.Y.S.2d 305 (8 July 1976)
- Historical Society of the New York Courts, Arthur Markewich (28 October 2026)